Ukraine Says It Unleashed 117 Drones in Attack on Russia: What to Know

The strike set several aircraft on fire, video showed, and dealt a symbolic blow to Moscow’s relentless bombing campaign.

Ukraine Strikes Russian Air Bases in Large-Scale Drone Attack

0:58Ukraine launched one of its broadest assaults of the war against air bases inside Russia, targeting sites from eastern Siberia to Russia’s western border.CreditCredit…Anatolii Stepanov/Reuters

By Maria VarenikovaAnastasia KuznietsovaNataliya VasilyevaMarc SantoraDevon Lum and Ephrat Livn NEW YORK TIMES

June 2, 2025

Ukraine said it secretly planted a swarm of drones in Russia and then unleashed them in a surprise attack on Sunday, hitting airfields from eastern Siberia to Russia’s western border.

The strike set several Russian aircraft on fire, stunned the Kremlin and dealt a strategic and symbolic blow to Moscow’s relentless bombing campaign in Ukraine.

Russian officials said that there were no casualties and that other Ukrainian attacks had been repelled.

Here’s what to know about the operation.

What to know

Russia’s Defense Ministry said on Sunday that Ukrainian drones had attacked airfields in five regions stretching across five time zones. Several aircraft caught fire in the regions of Murmansk, near the border with Norway, and Irkutsk, in eastern Siberia, the ministry said.

“Some participants of the terrorist attacks were detained,” it said.

Ukraine said that 117 drones were used in the attacks. An official in Ukraine’s security services, known as the S.B.U., said that dozens of aircraft had been damaged in the strikes. The person spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss a sensitive intelligence operation.

It was not immediately possible to independently confirm the Ukrainian claim or the details from Russia’s Defense Ministry.

Want to stay updated on what’s happening in Russia and Ukraine? Sign up for Your Places: Global Update

, and we’ll send our latest coverage to your inbox.

The New York Times verified videos that showed successful strikes at Olenya air base in the Murmansk region and the Belaya air base in the Irkutsk region. It also verified damage to at least five aircraft — four of them strategic bombers.

The plan was called Operation Spider’s Web. Drones were planted across Russia, near military bases, the Ukrainian said, and then activated simultaneously.

President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine said on social media Sunday that planning had begun a year and a half ago. He called the results “absolutely brilliant.”

Those involved in the attack, he added, were withdrawn from Russia before it took place.

On Monday, the Ukrainians offered more details about the operation. Over many months, they said, dozens of drones were secretly transported into Russia. They were packed onto pallets inside wooden containers with remote-controlled lids and then loaded onto trucks, an S.B.U. statement said.

Ukrainian officials said the crates were rigged to self-destruct after the drones were released. There was no indication that the drivers of the trucks knew what they were hauling, Ukrainian officials said.

Volodymyr Zelensky stands at a lectern and in front of a blue wall with images and writing.
President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine said on social media Sunday that planning for the strike had begun a year and a half ago. He called the results of the assault “absolutely brilliant.”Credit…Mindaugas Kulbis/Associated Press

The scale and details of the operation could not be independently verified.

A video verified by The Times shows two drones being launched from containers mounted on the back of a semi-truck less than four miles from the Belaya air base. Both drones fly in the direction of large plumes of smoke rising from the base. Footage recorded shortly afterward shows the same containers ablaze.

Another video shows drones flying less than four miles from the Olenya air base. The person recording could be heard suggesting that the drones had been launched from a truck parked just down the road. The Times could not confirm that those drones had been part of the assaults.

Ukraine said 41 planes had been hit, or about one-third of the strategic cruise-missile carriers at Russian air bases across three time zones. The Times verified that four Tu-95 bombers and one Antonov cargo plane were hit.

Russian military bloggers said the Ukrainian damage estimates were inflated. One influential Russian military blogger, Rybar, put the number of damaged Russian aircraft at 13, including up to 12 strategic bombers.

Western estimates suggest that Russia had slightly more than 60 active Tu-95s and about 20 Tu-160 bombers, according to Col. Markus Reisner, a historian and an officer in the Austrian Armed Forces. “Replacing losses will be very challenging,” he said.

The Ukrainian operation appears to have put a “real dent” in Russia’s ability to launch large salvos of cruise missiles, said Ben Hodges, a retired general who commanded the U.S. Army in Europe. “The surprise that they achieved will have a shock on the system as the Russians try to figure out how these trucks loaded with explosives got so deep inside of Russia,” he added.

“This is a stunning success for Ukraine’s special services,” said Justin Bronk, a senior research fellow for air power and technology at the Royal United Services Institute in London.

“If even half the total claim of 41 aircraft damaged/destroyed is confirmed, it will have a significant impact on the capacity of the Russian Long Range Aviation force to keep up its regular large-scale cruise missile salvos against Ukrainian cities and infrastructure, whilst also maintaining their nuclear deterrence and signaling patrols against NATO and Japan,” he said in an email.

The attack in Irkutsk, on the Belaya air base, was also the first time that any place in Siberia had been attacked by Ukraine’s drones since the war began with Russia’s full-scale invasion in February 2022.

The Olenya base in the Murmansk region, which also came under attack, is also one of Russia’s key strategic airfields, hosting nuclear-capable aircraft.

Ukraine had executed ambitious drone attacks on Russian territory before, but Russia had defended against them. In late 2022, Kyiv targeted two airfields hundreds of miles inside Russia using long-range drones. But Russia adapted to such strikes, building protective structures around depots at bases, bringing in more air-defense assets and routinely repositioning its fleet.

Ukraine — which has banked on expanding the use of domestically produced drones — turned to a new approach and, in the process, put together a playbook that others facing off against a more powerful enemy may adopt, as well.

The idea behind Operation Spider’s Web was to transport small, first-person-view drones close enough to Russian airfields to render traditional air-defense systems useless, officials said.

The operation ranks as a signature event on par with the sinking of the Russian flagship Moskva early in the war and the maritime drone assaults that forced the Russian Navy to largely abandon the home port of the Black Sea Fleet in Sevastopol, Crimea, which Moscow said in 2014 that it had “annexed.”

Although the full extent of the damage from Ukraine’s strikes on Sunday is unknown, the attacks showed that Kyiv was adapting and evolving in the face of a larger military with deeper resources.

The Ukrainian strikes came a day before Russia and Ukraine met in Istanbul for further peace talks. While Kyiv shared its peace terms with Moscow ahead of the meeting, Russia presented its terms only on Monday. The Ukrainian delegation said it would need a week to review Moscow’s proposal, delaying further discussion.

At a NATO meeting of Baltic and Nordic countries, Mr. Zelensky said on Monday that the operation showed Russia that it was also vulnerable to serious losses and “that is what will push it toward diplomacy.”

But analysts say the attacks are unlikely to alter the political calculus of Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin. There was no indication that the attack had changed the Kremlin’s belief that it holds an advantage over Ukraine, as it counts on the weakening resolve of some of Kyiv’s allies and its ability to grind down outnumbered Ukrainian troops.

Maria Varenikova covers Ukraine and its war with Russia.

Marc Santora has been reporting from Ukraine since the beginning of the war with Russia. He was previously based in London as an international news editor focused on breaking news events and earlier the bureau chief for East and Central Europe, based in Warsaw. He has also reported extensively from Iraq and Africa.

Devon Lum is a reporter on the Visual Investigations team at The Times, specializing in open-source techniques and visual analysis.

UN says 14,000 babies could die in Gaza in next 48 hours under Israeli aid blockade

UN says 14,000 babies could die in Gaza in next 48 hours under Israeli aid blockade

Australia, UK, France and Canada warn Israel of action if ‘egregious’ conduct in Gaza continues. 

 – Jem Bartholomew – The Guardian – 20 May 2025

This speaks for itself, even in the number were half of that. What makes this tragedy as bad is Ukraine Russia is that it has killed more or as many proportionally. Israel and Palestine together have 15 million people. Russia and Ukraine have 185 million twelve times the number as in the European war. (11 times the population). 62,000 Palestinians have been killed, fewer than 3000. Russia and Ukraine each have more than 200,000 war dead and another 700,000 injured. The Ukrainbs have uo to 1,000,000 war dead.

Please do the numbers.!

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/may/20/first-thing-un-says-14000-babies-could-die-in-gaza-in-next-48-hours-under-israeli-aid-blockade

A boy in Gaza is fed with a spoon

A boy in Gaza is fed with food from a community kitchen at the Muwasi camp for displaced Palestinians in Khan Younis on 18 May. Photograph: Abdel Kareem Hana/AP

Good morning.

The UN’s humanitarian chief, Tom Fletcher, told the BBC this morning that 14,000 babies could die in Gaza in 48 hours if aid did not reach them in time. Five aid trucks entered Gaza on Monday but Fletcher described this as a “drop in the ocean” and totally inadequate for the population’s needs.

It followed the director general of the World Health Organization, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, saying yesterday that 2 million people were starving in the Gaza Strip while “tonnes of food is blocked at the border” by Israel.

The leaders of the UK, France and Canada yesterday condemned Israel’s “egregious actions” in Gaza and warned of joint action if Israel continued. Meanwhile, Palestinians began fleeing Khan Younis as Israel ordered people to “evacuate immediately” before an “unprecedented attack” that the military says is targeting Hamas infrastructure.

Israel targets Nasser hospital as Netanyahu vows to take control of all of Gaza – video

  • What else is the UN saying about Israel’s aid blockade, in place since 2 March? A UN-backed report recently estimated that one in five people in the territory were facing starvation. The UN posted a statement on Monday reading: “Everyone in Gaza is hungry. Without immediate action, nearly a quarter of the population could be pushed into famine. Food aid must be allowed into Gaza now to prevent a catastrophe.”
  • Here’s what the Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, has said: Israel decided on Sunday to resume the entry of a “basic quantity” of food, after coming under increasing international pressure. But yesterday Netanyahu hit back at the UK, France and Canada for condemning Israel, calling on them to follow Donald Trump’s example.
  • What’s the latest with Israel’s ongoing military bombardment? Gaza’s civil defence agency said Israel had killed at least 44 people in Gaza today. Al Jazeera reported that Israeli forces bombed a pharmaceutical laboratory. Hundreds of people have been killed in the past week, many of them women and children, as Israel’s attacks have intensified.

Trump and Putin hold two-hour phone call but Kremlin refuses Ukraine ceasefire

Composite of Trump and Putin

Beyond Trump’s optimistic rhetoric, no breakthrough appears in sight. Composite: EPA

Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump held a rare two-hour phone call yesterday, but the Russian leader declined to support a US-proposed 30-day unconditional ceasefire, to which Ukraine had already agreed.

Putin also suggested his country’s maximalist objectives in the war with Ukraine were unchanged. Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, insisted Ukraine was ready for a full ceasefire and direct negotiations with Moscow, but said: “If the Russians are not ready to stop the killings, there must be stronger sanctions.”

  • How did Trump try to spin the call? He posted optimistically on Truth Social: “The tone and spirit of the conversation were excellent … Russia and Ukraine will immediately start negotiations toward a Ceasefire and, more importantly, an END to the War.”
  • But … Trump later suggested the US could abandon its involvement, telling reporters that if there was no progress, “I’m just going to back away”.

Trump administration freezes more than $2 billion in grants to Harvard

More breath-taking attacks by Trump 2.0 and his flying monkeys of the well-being of the country he was narrowly elected to serve.

by Filip Timotija – 04/14/25 9:36 PM ET

People sit on the steps of a campus building at Harvard University.
Maddie Meyer, Getty Images file photoA view of Harvard Yard on the campus of Harvard University on July 8, 2020, in Cambridge, Mass.

https://instaread.co/player?article=trump-administration-freezes-more-than-2-billion-in-grants-to-harvard&publication=thehill&article_url=https%3A%2F%2Fthehill.com%2Fhomenews%2Feducation%2F5248891-trump-administration-freezes-more-than-2-billion-in-grants-to-harvard&version=1744729200000

President Trump’s administration said it will freeze around $2.2 billion in multi-year grants and $60 million in multi-year contracts to Harvard University after the Ivy League institution rejected the government’s demands earlier Monday. 

“Harvard’s statement today reinforces the troubling entitlement mindset that is endemic in our nation’s most prestigious universities and colleges – that federal investment does not come with the responsibility to uphold civil rights laws,” the Joint Task Force to Combat Anti-Semitism said in a statement Monday evening. 

The response from the administration came just hours after Harvard’s leadership said that it would not comply with the demands from the federal government, including instituting changes around protesting and diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) efforts in order to keep their funding. 

“No government — regardless of which party is in power — should dictate what private universities can teach, whom they can admit and hire, and which areas of study and inquiry they can pursue,” Harvard’s President Alan Garber said Monday.

He said the school is already working on several initiatives to fight antisemitism and it will continue to do so in the future, but the administration’s requests are a step too far. 

WCMH: debate over SNAP

Next

Stay-01:20

Combating antisemitism “will not be achieved by assertions of power, unmoored from the law, to control teaching and learning at Harvard and to dictate how we operate. The work of addressing our shortcomings, fulfilling our commitments, and embodying our values is ours to define and undertake as a community,” Garber said. 

Last week, the federal government asked the Ivy League school to also reform its admission and hiring practices, make leadership changes, probe departments for antisemitism and ban face masks, among other demands, in order to keep the funding. 

Sign up for the Morning Report

The latest in politics and policy. Direct to your inbox.

By signing up, I agree to the Terms of Use, have reviewed the Privacy Policy, and to receive personalized offers and communications via email, on-site notifications, and targeted advertising using my email address from The Hill, Nexstar Media Inc., and its affiliates

“The disruption of learning that has plagued campuses in recent years is unacceptable,” the task force said Friday evening. “The harassment of Jewish students is intolerable. It is time for elite universities to take the problem seriously and commit to meaningful change if they wish to continue receiving taxpayer support.” 

When reached for comment, Harvard’s spokesperson pointed The Hill to Garber’s Friday statement, where he said that “for the government to retreat from these partnerships now risks not only the health and well-being of millions of individuals, but also the economic security and vitality of our nation.” 

The current administration has targeted multiple Ivy League institutions, accusing them of not doing enough to fight antisemitism on campuses, particularly after the Palestinian militant group Hamas’s Oct. 7 terrorist attack on Israel.

Deadly Israeli strikes mar Gaza Eid celebrations as Netanyahu says pressure on Hamas is ‘working’

Make no mistake. This is one of the atrocities of our time as Americans look the other way. Yes Israel was viciously attacked on October 7, 1923. But the response against Gaza (almost 50,000 confirmed civilian deaths) is frightfully disproportionate to the attacks). Most Palestinians (including the 10,000 + children killed) did not even know about the Hamas invasion of Israel at that time. Both the Biden and Trump administrations sent aid to Israel while this was going on. The Israelis do not need money for American weapons. The Palestinians in Gaza do need food, water and medical help.

By Eyad Kourdi, Ibrahim Dahman, Mohammad al-Sawalhi and Sophie Tanno, CNN

 4 minute read 

Updated 11:52 AM EDT, Sun March 30, 2025

Victims of an Israeli strike on the Al-Mawasi area of Khan Younis Sunday are laid to rest.

Victims of an Israeli strike on the Al-Mawasi area of Khan Younis Sunday are laid to rest. Abed Rahim Khatib/Anadolu via Getty ImagesCNN — 

Israeli airstrikes on a tent and a home housing displaced people in southern Gaza killed 10 people Sunday, including children, as Palestinians observed the first day of Eid-al-Fitr, rescuers said.

The Israeli military is stepping up its renewed campaign in Gaza, with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu saying efforts to pressure Hamas into releasing more hostages were “working” and vowing to implement Donald Trump’s hugely controversial scheme to relocate Palestinians from the territory.

Twenty people were also injured in the strike on the Al-Mawasi area, Khan Younis’s Director of Civil Defense Yamen Abu Suleiman told CNN, warning the death toll would likely rise.

A local hospital confirmed the fatalities so far, saying five children had been killed.

Video of the aftermath of the strike shows some of the child victims wearing new Eid clothing. In Middle Eastern tradition, children wear new clothes to celebrate the three-day holiday.

In the footage, a man is seen dragging a child toward the hospital, asking: “What was these children’s fault? They did nothing.”

CNN has approached the Israel Defense Forces for comment.

Palestinians in the Gaza Strip are observing Eid this year in the face of dwindling aid supplies and a mounting death toll in the strip.

“Every year, I’m used to baking Eid cookies for my children,” one displaced woman, Ameneh Shaqla, told CNN. “But because of the current situation and how expensive everything has become, I was only able to prepare one kilogram — just to bring them some joy so they don’t stay sad because of the war.”

Abdel Fattah Khalil Karnawi, a street vendor, told of the soaring prices for clothing. “We came to the market to get Eid clothes for the children. Unfortunately, the circumstances are tough and prices are very high.”

Bodies of Palestinians are brought to the Nasser Hospital by their relatives in Khan Younis Sunday.

Bodies of Palestinians are brought to the Nasser Hospital by their relatives in Khan Younis Sunday. Hani Alshaer/Anadolu via Getty Images

Israel resumed its offensive on Gaza almost two weeks ago, shattering a two-month-old ceasefire. It imposed a complete blockade of humanitarian aid entering the enclave, warning that its forces would maintain a permanent presence in parts of Gaza until the release of the remaining 24 hostages who are believed to still be alive. Hundreds of Palestinians have been killed in the enclave since then.

Al-Mawasi, a coastal region west of the city of Rafah, has repeatedly come under Israeli attacks, even though it was previously designated by Israel as a “humanitarian area.” Thousands of Palestinians have fled to Al-Mawasi, living for months in makeshift tents made of cloth and nylon, with little access to humanitarian relief.

In comments made on Sunday morning, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu vowed to step up the military campaign, saying the pressure on Hamas was “working.”

“It works because it operates simultaneously: on one hand, it crushes Hamas’ military and governmental capabilities and, on the other, it creates the conditions for the release of our hostages. This is exactly what we are doing,” Netanyahu said at a government meeting.

Rejecting assertions Israel was unwilling to negotiate, he added that “cracks” were showing in Hamas following the renewal of the offensive and said Israel would implement “the Trump Plan — the voluntary emigration plan,” a scheme Trump himself appears to have walked back on.

New ceasefire proposal

Sunday’s strike comes as Hamas has agreed to a new Egyptian proposal to release five hostages, including the American-Israeli Edan Alexander, in exchange for a renewed ceasefire, a Hamas source told CNN.

The proposal is similar to one presented several weeks ago by US special envoy Steve Witkoff, although it is not clear whether it also includes the release of additional bodies of deceased hostages.

In exchange for the release of five hostages, Hamas expects a return to phase 1 ceasefire conditions, including the entry of humanitarian aid into Gaza, as well as an agreement from Israel to negotiate the second phase of the ceasefire, the source said.

Israel has responded to the Egyptian offer with a counter-proposal, according to a statement from the Israeli prime minister’s office.

“Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu conducted a series of consultations yesterday, following a proposal received from the mediators. In recent hours, Israel transferred its counter-proposal to the mediators, in full coordination with the United States,” the office said.

Netanyahu is facing competing demands at home from his right-wing coalition who want to increase pressure on Hamas and families of the remaining hostages who fear more military action could endanger their loved ones.

This story has been updated.

CNN’s Jeremy Diamond and Tamar Michaelis contributed reporting.

In Averting a Shutdown, Schumer Ignites a Rebellion

Mar 14, 2025 5:50 PM E

Philip Elliott

Philip Elliott

Elliott is a senior correspondent at TIME, based in the Washington, D.C., bureau.

Senate Takes Up Budget Bill Passed By House As Funding Deadline Looms
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) leaves the Democratic caucus lunch at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C. on March 13, 2025.Kayla Bartkowski—Getty Images

This article is part of The D.C. Brief, TIME’s politics newsletter. Sign up here to get stories like this sent to your inbox.

The Senate’s move Friday to avoid a government shutdown—essentially ceding spending power to President Donald Trump and downgrading Congress to an advisory role—was an epic climbdown that is rightfully sending the Democrats’ base into a spiral.

The rage among Democrats trained on one figure: Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York, who signaled a day earlier that the fight was over and it was time to move on. The choice was to hold open the doors of a scaled-down government or to slam it closed on what stood before, and the outcome tells the story.

That does not mean anyone in the party was happy about how this went down.

Asked Friday if it was time for a new Leadership team for Senate Democrats, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries declined to throw Schumer a life preserver. “Next question,” Jeffries said. In other spaces, there was an open talk of primarying Schumer when he is next on the ballot in 2028.

Nine Senate Democrats—and Independent Angus King of Maine who caucuses with them—joined all but one Senate Republican on Friday to sidestep a government shutdown. The stopgap spending plan gives the White House a freer hand to shutter dozens of federal functions created by Congress and eliminate thousands of jobs. Congress, at least through Sept. 30, is in effect legislating a stronger executive branch that can basically do anything with the money lawmakers release.

It was a crap ending to what’s been a crap week for Democrats, frankly. On top of all of the chaos unfurling from the Trump White House by way of new executive orders, hires, fires, and tariffs, they have also had to face this ticking clock of a government shutdown. House Republicans jammed Democrats with a party-line spending plan that is especially heinous in its cuts to the District of Columbia. Then, the House ditched town, giving the Senate zero say to tweak the spending. Then, Schumer on Wednesday asserted the framework had insufficient support to get across the finish line. And, then, a day later, he said he would support the spending structure to block a shutdown.

The whiplash from the shut-it-down to keep-it-alive posturing only fed the contempt that many Democrats were already harboring toward their current leaders.

“Whatever happens will happen,” said Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island, who was a “no” vote and used the hours ahead of the votes to telegraph a dark fatalism.

That resignation has been bleeding through Washington in recent weeks. The fight among anti-Trumpers of all stripes has faded in recent days as Trump’s brazen conquest of the spending system was looking increasingly inevitable. The chest-thumping celebrations in the White House and the antics of its pet-project DOGE intersected to rile up Democrats, who have been trying to defend all corners of the federal cogs.

Ultimately, though, the Democrats in a position to thwart Trump and his GOP allies caved. Republicans have majorities in the House and Senate, plus control of the White House. But Senate rules require 60 votes to get balls rolling, and Republicans had just 52 yes votes in the Upper Chamber. That meant GOP lawmakers needed to get eight converts among Democrats. 

Senate Democrats looked at the math, polling, and their own talents. They made the call that the mismatch of their desire to oppose Trump’s unilateral power grab did not match their ability to actually stop it. Poli-sci nerds will tell you that actual power lies at the point where will and capacity are synced up. Democrats had the power to shut down the government but lacked the bandwidth to sell it as the other guys’ fault, or put forth a unified plan on how to reopen the government on better terms.

The problem now lies with how Democrats deal with the Schumer sitch. They are very, very quiet at the moment, but there are the faintest of rumblings about whether Schumer gets to hold his position as Minority Leader for the balance of this term. Progressive and rank-and-file corners of the party alike were uneasy about this call, and steering this unruly ship into 2026 is a job that is not something to be taken lightly. 

To be clear: Schumer is not at risk of being deposed in short order, and Democrats do not carry House Republicans’ appetite for cannibalizing their own. Schumer acts on calculations, not confidences. His decision to side with keeping the government open at the expense of legislative branch power came from a place of rationality, not rashness. But it still carried costs, and the first among them was his standing with frustrated Democrats who want the opposition party to do its job: to oppose an administration hellbent on dismantling a government it holds in sheer contempt.

Government, for the moment, survives. Democrats, for the foreseeable future, find their ability to check Trump diminished. And, until Congress reverses itself, the legislative branch takes a secondary role to the executive. 

Make sense of what matters in Washington. Sign up for the D.C. Brief newsletter.

Trump Doubles Metal Tariffs as He Presses Canada to Become Part of U.S.

BLOG EDITOR: Canada Says it will have None of this! Let see if the delusional Donald will handle this. We are in an alternative universe from anything we’ve seen. The question is who will suffer more but for the U.S. more like what will this first wave of retaliation do to his odd and destructive administration.

The president said he would double tariffs set to go into effect on Wednesday and threatened further levies, as he ramps up economic pressure on America’s closest ally.

Ana Swanson

By Ana Swanson

Ana Swanson covers international trade and reported from Washington.

  • March 11, 2025Updated 11:23 a.m. ET

President Trump escalated his fight with Canada on Tuesday, saying that he would double tariffs on steel and aluminum imports and threatening to inflict even more pain on one of America’s closest traditional allies as he pressed Canada to become part of the United States.

His comments sent jittery markets tumbling, with the S&P 500 down about 1 percent in early morning trading.

In a post on his social media platform, Mr. Trump wrote that Canadian steel and aluminum would face a 50 percent tariff, double what he plans to charge on metals from other countries beginning Wednesday. He said the levies were in response to an additional charge that Ontario placed on electricity coming into the United States, and he threatened more tariffs if Canada didn’t drop various levies it imposes on U.S. dairy and agricultural products.

“If other egregious, long time Tariffs are not likewise dropped by Canada, I will substantially increase, on April 2nd, the Tariffs on Cars coming into the U.S. which will, essentially, permanently shut down the automobile manufacturing business in Canada,” he threatened.

Tariffs in Trump’s second term in office

As of March 6

StatusCountryDescription
In effectFeb. 4China10% on all imports ›
In effectMarch 4Mexico25% on all imports ›
In effectMarch 4Canada25% on most imports, lower rate for energy ›
In effectMarch 4ChinaAdditional 10% on all imports ›
SuspendedMarch 6Canada and MexicoReprieve for goods that fall under the USMCA trade pact ›
PlannedMarch 12World25% on aluminum and steel ›
PlannedMarch 12CanadaAdditional 25% on aluminum and steel ›
PlannedApril 2WorldUnspecified tariff on all agricultural products
PlannedApril 2WorldUnspecified tariff on all foreign cars ›

Source: Peterson Institute for International Economics, Wells Fargo Economic Insights 

The New York Times

Mr. Trump went on to say that “the only thing that makes sense” is for Canada to become the 51st U.S. state.

The moves will significantly escalate a confrontation with one of America’s largest trading partners, and call into question Mr. Trump’s intentions for one of its closest allies. Canadian officials first thought Mr. Trump’s idea of absorbing Canada into the United State was a joke, but they have more recently begun to take the president’s threats seriously.

Mr. Trump spent much of his social media post on Tuesday essentially cajoling Canada to become part of America, writing: “This would make all Tariffs, and everything else, totally disappear. Canadians taxes will be very substantially reduced, they will be more secure, militarily and otherwise, than ever before, there would no longer be a Northern Border problem, and the greatest and most powerful nation in the World will be bigger, better and stronger than ever — And Canada will be a big part of that.”

“The artificial line of separation drawn many years ago will finally disappear, and we will have the safest and most beautiful Nation anywhere in the World,” he added.

Editors’ Picks

Big Drama Cannot Distract From Irrelevant ClothesHelp, I’m Marrying My Co-Worker and No One at Work Knows!Jam Like a King: Charles Releases a Playlist

President Trump said Canadian steel and aluminum would face a 50 percent tariff when coming into the United States.Credit…Nick Iwanyshyn/The Canadian Press, via Associated Press

Last week, Mr. Trump hit Canada and Mexico with sweeping 25 percents on all imports, before walking some — but not all — of those levies back a few days later.

Mr. Trump said the higher metal tariffs on Canada would be a response to a surcharge on electricity it exports to the United States. On Monday, Ontario, Canada’s most populous province, retaliated against Mr. Trump’s tariffs by adding a 25 percent surcharge to the electricity it exports to Michigan, Minnesota and New York.

Canada is in the middle of a political transition as it prepares to swear in a new prime minister, Mark Carney, an economist and central banker, to replace Justin Trudeau, who announced in January that he would be resigning after almost 10 years in office. Mr. Trump’s move would punish the entire country for a retaliation measure taken on by one province.

Vjosa Isai and Danielle Kaye contributed reporting.

Ana Swanson covers trade and international economics for The Times and is based in Washington. She has been a journalist for more than a decade. More about Ana Swanson

A Day of American Infamy

Opinion– So much has been written about this dark episode. That it was a dark day for Americans. (READ BELOW). A vital part of understanding this MAGA Republican stunt is that one has to understand: A.) What’s New? A rare look, not on the campaign rally circuit, not a tweet, not an interview.

The tag team bullying from Trump alone removes any doubt that we have to deal with something never seen before: A president with a diagnosable neurotic: narcissistic, angry, grandiose, bullying personality and persona. Not psychotic, as far as we can tell, but a bundle of neuroses so transparent and palpable that we, unformal an informed or simply interested public that might now be a voting majority (too slight) recognizes the trouble we are in.

Here we are talking about a common sense diagnosis because we are unlikely to have a medical one. But like Justice Potter Stewart on pornography we can’t define it be we know it when we see it.

B. ) on Policy Trump’s desire for a cease fire and talks is not inherently bad If it results in the saving of Ukrainian lives and widespread destruction of their country. NATO membership for Ukraine should be completely off the table, unless the United States wants to allow Russia to annex parts of Mexico.

I’ll stop here because of the oceans of electronic and print ink spilled on everything Trump, the sheer embarrassments and now outrages. These were promised during the 2024 campaign, Trump won by 1%, and now we are faced with the results: promises kept. If there were a parliamentary election (a fantasy) today in America Trump might win very slightly but if a Referendum he would not. The question is not If the regime will implode but when.

It’s no exaggeration to repeat the obvious: Trump is overplaying his hand. He’ll always have lapdogs like Lindsey Graham, but as public outrage even in the 55% range and getting hotter this will implode. Right now it may seem like a slow drip of bone-headed actions (take your pick: “Gulf of America? or a tax policy tilted toward the wealthy) , but the die is cast and the idea of a Gotterdammerung is too complimentary. The thugs are both the coterie around Trump and some, not all, of the people he has enabled: the Rudy Giuliani’s and the freed by pardon of then naive hoodlums that stormed the Capitol 4+ years ago. [I did not, could not stop where I indicated Above]

Bret Stephens

Feb. 28, 2025

In a black-and-white photo in the Oval Office, President Trump and Vice President JD Vance wave their hands dismissively at President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine.
Credit…Andrew Harni
Bret Stephens

By Bret Stephens

Opinion Columnist NEW YORK TIMES

, and we’ll send our latest coverage to your inbox.

In August 1941, about four months before the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, Franklin Roosevelt met with Winston Churchill aboard warships in Newfoundland’s Placentia Bay and agreed to the Atlantic Charter, a joint declaration by the world’s leading democratic powers on “common principles” for a postwar world.

Among its key points: “no aggrandizement, territorial or other”; “sovereign rights and self-government restored to those who have been forcibly deprived of them”; “freedom from fear and want”; freedom of the seas; “access, on equal terms, to the trade and to the raw materials of the world which are needed for their economic prosperity.”

The charter, and the alliance that came of it, is a high point of American statesmanship. On Friday in the Oval Office, the world witnessed the opposite. Volodymyr Zelensky, Ukraine’s embattled democratic leader, came to Washington prepared to sign away anything he could offer President Trump except his nation’s freedom, security and common sense. For that, he was rewarded with a lecture on manners from the most mendacious vulgarian and ungracious host ever to inhabit the White House.

If Roosevelt had told Churchill to sue for peace on any terms with Adolf Hitler and to fork over Britain’s coal reserves to the United States in exchange for no American security guarantees, it might have approximated what Trump did to Zelensky. Whatever one might say about how Zelensky played his cards poorly — either by failing to behave with the degree of all-fours sycophancy that Trump demands or to maintain his composure in the face of JD Vance’s disingenuous provocations — this was a day of American infamy.

Where do we go from here?

If there’s one silver lining to this fiasco, it’s that Zelensky did not sign the agreement on Ukrainian minerals that was forced on him this month by Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary who’s the Tom Hagen character in this protection-racket administration. The United States is entitled to some kind of reward for helping Ukraine defend itself — and Ukraine’s destruction of much of Russia’s military might should top the list, followed by the innovation Ukraine demonstrated in pioneering revolutionary forms of low-cost drone warfare, which the Pentagon will be keen to emulate.

Sign up for the Opinion Today newsletter  Get expert analysis of the news and a guide to the big ideas shaping the world every weekday morning. Get it sent to your inbox.

But if it’s a financial payback that the Trump administration seeks, the best place to get it is to seize, in collaboration with our European partners, Russia’s frozen assets and put them into an account by which Ukraine could pay for American-made arms. If the United States won’t do this, the Europeans should: Let the Ukrainians rely for their arms on Dassault, Saab, Rheinmetall, BAE Systems and other European defense contractors and see how that goes over with the “America First”-ers. Hopefully that could serve as another spur to Europeans to invest, as quickly and heavily as they can, in their depleted militaries, not simply to strengthen NATO but also to hedge against its end.

There is a second opportunity: While Trump’s abuse of Zelensky might delight the MAGA crowd, it isn’t likely to play well with most voters, including the almost 30 percent of Republicans who, even now, believe it’s in our interest to stand with Ukraine. And while most Americans may want to see the war in Ukraine end, they almost surely don’t want to see it end on Vladimir Putin’s terms.

Nor should the Trump administration. A Russian victory in Ukraine, including a cease-fire that allows Moscow to consolidate its gains and recoup its strength before the next assault, will have precisely the same effect as the Taliban’s victory in Afghanistan: emboldening American enemies to behave more aggressively. Notice that, as Trump has ratcheted up pressure on Ukraine in recent weeks, Taiwan reported a surge in Chinese military drills around the island, while Chinese warships held live-fire exercises off the coast of Vietnam and came within 150 nautical miles of Sydney.

Those are points honorable conservatives should press: Can Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky and Representative Don Bacon of Nebraska — two Republicans who haven’t sold their souls on Ukraine — lead a delegation of like-minded conservatives to Kyiv?

Editors’ Picks

4 Ways to Make Better Soup FastThis Meatloaf Has a Brilliant Twist — and Makes a Mean SandwichThe Streaming Rush to Turn Scripture Into Scripts

More so, this should be an opportunity for Democrats. Joe Biden was right when he called this a “decisive decade” for the future of the free world; he just happened to be too feeble and cautious a messenger.

But there are tough-minded Democrats with military and security backgrounds — Representative Jason Crow of Colorado, Representative Seth Moulton of Massachusetts and Senator Elissa Slotkin of Michigan come to mind — who can restore the spirit of Harry Truman and John F. Kennedy to the Democratic Party. It’s a message of toughness and freedom they might also be able to sell to at least some Trump voters, who cast their ballots in November for the sake of a better America, not a greater Russia.

Still, there’s no getting around the fact that Friday was a dreadful day — dreadful for Ukraine, for the free world, for the legacy of an America that once stood for the principles of the Atlantic Charter.

Roosevelt and Reagan must be spinning in their graves, as are Churchill and Thatcher. It’s up to the rest of us to reclaim America’s honor from the gangsters who besmirched it in the White House.

More on President Trump, Vladimir Putin and Ukraine

Opinion | Thomas L. Friedman

The Disturbing Question at the Heart of the Trump-Zelensky Drama

Feb. 25, 2025

Opinion | Bret Stephens

America’s Most Shameful Vote Ever at the U.N.

Feb. 25, 2025

Opinion | Dana H. Allin and Jonathan Stevenson

America and Russia Are on the Same Side Now

Feb. 25, 2025

The Times is committed to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. We’d like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some tips. And here’s our email: letters@nytimes.com.

Follow the New York Times Opinion section on FacebookInstagramTikTokBlueskyWhatsApp and Threads.

Bret Stephens is an Opinion columnist for The Times, writing about foreign policy, domestic politics and cultural issues. Facebook

Republicans Face Angry Voters at Town Halls, Hinting at Broader Backlash

New York Times 2/25/25

After a monthlong honeymoon for the G.O.P. at the start of President Trump’s term, lawmakers are confronting a groundswell of fear and disaffection in districts around the country.

Representative Pete Sessions speaking with his hand raised in front of a projection of his congressional district at a town-hall meeting.
Representative Pete Sessions fielded a barrage of frustration from constituents at a town-hall meeting in Trinity, Texas, on Saturday.Credit…Mark Felix for The New York Times
Robert Jimison

By Robert Jimison

Robert Jimison, who covers Congress, reported from Trinity County in the 17th Congressional District of Texas.

  • Feb. 23, 2025

Some came with complaints about Elon Musk, President Trump’s billionaire ally who is carrying out an assault on the federal bureaucracy. Others demanded guarantees that Republicans in Congress would not raid the social safety net. Still others chided the G.O.P. to push back against Mr. Trump’s moves to trample the constitutional power of Congress.

When Representative Pete Sessions, Republican of Texas, arrived at a crowded community center on Saturday in the small rural town of Trinity in East Texas, he came prepared to deliver a routine update on the administration’s first month in office. Instead, he fielded a barrage of frustration and anger from constituents questioning Mr. Trump’s agenda and his tactics — and pressing Mr. Sessions and his colleagues on Capitol Hill to do something about it.

“The executive can only enforce laws passed by Congress; they cannot make laws,” said Debra Norris, a lawyer who lives in Huntsville, arguing that the mass layoffs and agency closures Mr. Musk has spearheaded were unconstitutional. “When are you going to wrest control back from the executive and stop hurting your constituents?”

Debra Norris standing for a photo outside of a town-hall meeting.
“When are you going to wrest control back from the executive?” Debra Norris, a lawyer who lives in Huntsville, asked Mr. Sessions.Credit…Mark Felix for The New York Times

Louis Smith, a veteran who lives in East Texas, told Mr. Sessions that he agreed with the effort to root out excessive spending, but he criticized the way it was being handled and presented to the public.

“I like what you’re saying, but you need to tell more people,” Mr. Smith said. “The guy in South Africa is not doing you any good — he’s hurting you more than he’s helping,” he added, referring to Mr. Musk and drawing nods and applause from many in the room.

In Trinity and in congressional districts around the country over the past week, Republican lawmakers returning home for their first congressional recess since Mr. Trump was sworn in faced similar confrontations with their constituents. In Georgia, Representative Rich McCormick struggled to respond as constituents shouted, jeered and booed at his response to questions about Mr. Musk’s access to government data. In Wisconsin, Representative Scott Fitzgerald was asked to defend the administration’s budget proposals as voters demanded to know whether cuts to essential services were coming.

Many of the most vocal complaints came from participants who identified themselves as Democrats, but a number of questions pressing Mr. Sessions and others around the country came from Republican voters. During a telephone town hall with Representative Stephanie Bice in Oklahoma, a man who identified himself as a Republican and retired U.S. Army officer voiced frustration over potential cuts to veterans benefits.

“How can you tell me that DOGE with some college whiz kids from a computer terminal in Washington, D.C., without even getting into the field, after about a week or maybe two, have determined that it’s OK to cut veterans benefits?” the man asked.

Editors’ Picks

Will It Crab Rangoon?To the Point: Short Novels Dominate International Booker Prize NomineesOh, This Old, Tattered, Moth-Eaten Thing?

Beyond town halls, some Democrats have organized a number of protests outside the offices of vulnerable Republicans. More than a hundred demonstrators rallied outside the New York district office of Representative Mike Lawler. Elected Democrats are also facing fury from within the ranks of their party. A group of voters held closed-door meetings with members from the office of Senator Chuck Schumer, Democrat of New York and the minority leader, after a demonstration at his New York offices.

Some of the scenes recalled the raucous town-hall meetings of 2009 that heralded the rise of the ultraconservative Tea Party, where throngs of voters showed up protesting President Barack Obama’s health care law and railed against government debt and taxes. It is not yet clear whether the current backlash will persist or reach the same intensity as it did back then. But the tenor of the sessions suggests that, after a brief honeymoon period for Mr. Trump and Republicans at the start of their governing trifecta, voters beginning to digest the effects of their agenda may be starting to sour on it.

Representative Rich McCormick speaking to reporters at the Capitol.
Representative Rich McCormick, a Republican from Georgia, also faced shouts and jeers from constituents at a meeting last week.Credit…Valerie Plesch for The New York Times

Mr. Sessions, who was first elected to Congress nearly three decades ago and represents a solidly Republican district, appeared unfazed by the disruptions on Saturday. Some audience members laughed at him and retorted with hushed but audible expletives when he spoke about his support of some of Mr. Trump’s policy proposals and early actions.

And some of his constituents were plainly pleased by what they had seen so far from the new all-Republican team controlling the White House and both chambers of Congress. Several cheered an executive order barring transgender women and girls from participating in school athletic programs designated for female students, applauded plans to shrink the Department of Education and welcomed calls from Mr. Sessions to end remote work flexibility for federal employees.

“Ladies and gentlemen, we are going to have a reduction in force,” Mr. Sessions told the crowd.

And while many in the room voiced displeasure over the sweeping changes underway in Washington, some were agitating for bolder action to address what they called government corruption — not for pumping the brakes.

As Mr. Sessions spoke about the administration’s efforts to streamline bureaucracy and root out wasteful spending, shouts erupted.

“Take care of it, Congressman,” one woman said, interrupting him.

“Do something about it,” another man added.

One man’s voice rose above the others railing against nongovernmental organizations that receive federal money: “They’re laundering money to NGOs. Who’s in jail?”

Still, much of the pressure came from constituents concerned about how he might be enabling Mr. Trump to enact policies that could hurt them.

Representative Pete Sessions shaking hands with John Watt, who is speaking with his hand raised.
Mr. Sessions did not promise that Social Security would be insulated from cuts when pressed by John Watt, left.Credit…Mark Felix for The New York Times

John Watt, the chairman of the Democratic Party in nearby Nacogdoches County, asked for guarantees from the congressman that he would oppose any cuts to Social Security if Mr. Trump and Mr. Musk turned their attention to the entitlement program.

“Will you be courageous enough to stand up to them?” Mr. Watt asked.

Mr. Sessions spoke at length about his support for the program, but said he could not promise it would be insulated from the blunt cuts Republicans in Washington are seeking across the government. Instead, he said he supported a comprehensive audit of the program that could result in some cuts.

“I’m not going to tell you I will never touch Social Security,” Mr. Sessions said, parting ways with Mr. Trump, who campaigned saying he never would. “What I will tell you is that I believe we’re going to do for the first time in years a top-to-bottom review of that. And I will come back, and I will do a town-hall meeting in your county and place myself before you and let you know about the options. But I don’t know what they’re proposing right now.”

It was a nod to the uncertainty surrounding the Republican budget plan, even as House leaders hope to hold a vote on it within days. Already, the level of cuts they are contemplating to Medicaid has drawn resistance from some G.O.P. lawmakers whose constituents depend heavily on the program, raising questions about whether they will have the votes to pass their blueprint at all.

The public pushback could further complicate that debate, as well as efforts to reach a spending agreement as lawmakers return to Washington this week with less than three weeks to avert a government shutdown.

A woman raising her hand sitting at a table with red, white and blue decorations at a town-hall meeting.
The tenor of the town-hall meetings, including Mr. Sessions’s, suggested that voters were beginning to digest the effects of the Republican agenda.Credit…Mark Felix for The New York Times

Republicans generally hold fewer in-person open town halls than their Democratic counterparts, opting instead for more controlled settings, such as telephone town halls, that minimize the risk of public confrontations. But even before last week, they had begun hearing frustration from voters, who have also expressed their discontent by flooding the phones of congressional offices.

With their already narrow majority in the House, G.O.P. lawmakers are in a fragile position. A voter backlash could sweep out some of their most vulnerable members in midterm elections next year. But the pushback in recent days has come not only in highly competitive districts but also in deeply Republican ones, suggesting a broader problem for the party.

And there is little sign that Mr. Trump is letting up. On Saturday, Mr. Trump said in a social media post that Mr. Musk “is doing a great job, but I would like to see him be more aggressive.” Mr. Musk responded by sending government employees emails that he said were “requesting to understand what they got done last week. Failure to respond will be taken as a resignation.”

Republicans’ plans for Medicaid have a political problem

GOP lawmakers expected to vote soon on slashing the insurance program for low-income people represent tens of millions reliant on it.

Louis Smith, a veteran who lives in East Texas, told Mr. Sessions that he agreed with the effort to root out excessive spending, but he criticized the way it was being handled and presented to the public.

“I like what you’re saying, but you need to tell more people,” Mr. Smith said. “The guy in South Africa is not doing you any good — he’s hurting you more than he’s helping,” he added, referring to Mr. Musk and drawing nods and applause from many in the room.

“I like what you’re saying, but you need to tell more people,” Mr. Smith said. “The guy in South Africa is not doing you any good — he’s hurting you more than he’s helping,” he added, referring to Mr. Musk and drawing nods and applause from many in the room.

In Trinity and in congressional districts around the country over the past week, Republican lawmakers returning home for their first congressional recess since Mr. Trump was sworn in faced similar confrontations with their constituents. In Georgia, Representative Rich McCormick struggled to respond as constituents shouted, jeered and booed at his response to questions about Mr. Musk’s access to government data. In Wisconsin, Representative Scott Fitzgerald was asked to defend the administration’s budget proposals as voters demanded to know whether cuts to essential services were coming.

Many of the most vocal complaints came from participants who identified themselves as Democrats, but a number of questions pressing Mr. Sessions and others around the country came from Republican voters. During a telephone town hall with Representative Stephanie Bice in Oklahoma, a man who identified himself as a Republican and retired U.S. Army officer voiced frustration over potential cuts to veterans benefits.

“How can you tell me that DOGE with some college whiz kids from a computer terminal in Washington, D.C., without even getting into the field, after about a week or maybe two, have determined that it’s OK to cut veterans benefits?” the man asked.

Editors’ Picks

Five Free Movies to Stream NowHow Can I Lower My Climate Risk When Buying a House?A Bachelorette, a Ballroom Dancer and a ‘Traitor’ Walk Into a Bar

Beyond town halls, some Democrats have organized a number of protests outside the offices of vulnerable Republicans. More than a hundred demonstrators rallied outside the New York district office of Representative Mike Lawler. Elected Democrats are also facing fury from within the ranks of their party. A group of voters held closed-door meetings with members from the office of Senator Chuck Schumer, Democrat of New York and the minority leader, after a demonstration at his New York offices.

Some of the scenes recalled the raucous town-hall meetings of 2009 that heralded the rise of the ultraconservative Tea Party, where throngs of voters showed up protesting President Barack Obama’s health care law and railed against government debt and taxes. It is not yet clear whether the current backlash will persist or reach the same intensity as it did back then. But the tenor of the sessions suggests that, after a brief honeymoon period for Mr. Trump and Republicans at the start of their governing trifecta, voters beginning to digest the effects of their agenda may be starting to sour on it.

Representative Rich McCormick speaking to reporters at the Capitol.
Representative Rich McCormick, a Republican from Georgia, also faced shouts and jeers from constituents at a meeting last week.Credit…Valerie Plesch for The New York Times

Mr. Sessions, who was first elected to Congress nearly three decades ago and represents a solidly Republican district, appeared unfazed by the disruptions on Saturday. Some audience members laughed at him and retorted with hushed but audible expletives when he spoke about his support of some of Mr. Trump’s policy proposals and early actions.

And some of his constituents were plainly pleased by what they had seen so far from the new all-Republican team controlling the White House and both chambers of Congress. Several cheered an executive order barring transgender women and girls from participating in school athletic programs designated for female students, applauded plans to shrink the Department of Education and welcomed calls from Mr. Sessions to end remote work flexibility for federal employees.

“Ladies and gentlemen, we are going to have a reduction in force,” Mr. Sessions told the crowd.

And while many in the room voiced displeasure over the sweeping changes underway in Washington, some were agitating for bolder action to address what they called government corruption — not for pumping the brakes.

As Mr. Sessions spoke about the administration’s efforts to streamline bureaucracy and root out wasteful spending, shouts erupted.

“Take care of it, Congressman,” one woman said, interrupting him.

“Do something about it,” another man added.

One man’s voice rose above the others railing against nongovernmental organizations that receive federal money: “They’re laundering money to NGOs. Who’s in jail?”

Still, much of the pressure came from constituents concerned about how he might be enabling Mr. Trump to enact policies that could hurt them.

Representative Pete Sessions shaking hands with John Watt, who is speaking with his hand raised.
Mr. Sessions did not promise that Social Security would be insulated from cuts when pressed by John Watt, left.Credit…Mark Felix for The New York Times

John Watt, the chairman of the Democratic Party in nearby Nacogdoches County, asked for guarantees from the congressman that he would oppose any cuts to Social Security if Mr. Trump and Mr. Musk turned their attention to the entitlement program.

“Will you be courageous enough to stand up to them?” Mr. Watt asked.

Mr. Sessions spoke at length about his support for the program, but said he could not promise it would be insulated from the blunt cuts Republicans in Washington are seeking across the government. Instead, he said he supported a comprehensive audit of the program that could result in some cuts.

“I’m not going to tell you I will never touch Social Security,” Mr. Sessions said, parting ways with Mr. Trump, who campaigned saying he never would. “What I will tell you is that I believe we’re going to do for the first time in years a top-to-bottom review of that. And I will come back, and I will do a town-hall meeting in your county and place myself before you and let you know about the options. But I don’t know what they’re proposing right now.”

It was a nod to the uncertainty surrounding the Republican budget plan, even as House leaders hope to hold a vote on it within days. Already, the level of cuts they are contemplating to Medicaid has drawn resistance from some G.O.P. lawmakers whose constituents depend heavily on the program, raising questions about whether they will have the votes to pass their blueprint at all.

The public pushback could further complicate that debate, as well as efforts to reach a spending agreement as lawmakers return to Washington this week with less than three weeks to avert a government shutdown.

A woman raising her hand sitting at a table with red, white and blue decorations at a town-hall meeting.
The tenor of the town-hall meetings, including Mr. Sessions’s, suggested that voters were beginning to digest the effects of the Republican agenda.Credit…Mark Felix for The New York Times

Republicans generally hold fewer in-person open town halls than their Democratic counterparts, opting instead for more controlled settings, such as telephone town halls, that minimize the risk of public confrontations. But even before last week, they had begun hearing frustration from voters, who have also expressed their discontent by flooding the phones of congressional offices.

With their already narrow majority in the House, G.O.P. lawmakers are in a fragile position. A voter backlash could sweep out some of their most vulnerable members in midterm elections next year. But the pushback in recent days has come not only in highly competitive districts but also in deeply Republican ones, suggesting a broader problem for the party.

And there is little sign that Mr. Trump is letting up. On Saturday, Mr. Trump said in a social media post that Mr. Musk “is doing a great job, but I would like to see him be more aggressive.” Mr. Musk responded by sending government employees emails that he said were “requesting to understand what they got done last week. Failure to respond will be taken as a resignation.”

President Trump standing onstage in front of a CPAC sign with his fist raised.
“I have not yet begun to fight, and neither have you,” President Trump said at the Conservative Political Action Conference on Saturday.Credit…Maansi Srivastava for The New York Times

Hours later, during a speech at the Conservative Political Action Conference, Mr. Trump signaled that he was only just beginning to enact his agenda.

“I have not yet begun to fight, and neither have you,” Mr. Trump told a crowd of his supporters at the annual gathering outside in Washington.

Such remarks offer little cover for Republicans like Mr. Sessions facing tough questions from voters who are beginning to chafe at the changes Mr. Trump is pursuing.

But the congressman said that tense exchanges would not deter him from holding more events and seeking opportunities to communicate with his constituents, whether they agree with his positions or not. He said he would hold more events across the district next week, and hopes that after another week in Washington, he will be able to provide more clarity for those who show up.

“I heard them and they heard me,” he said of Saturday’s gathering. “And I don’t think there was a fight.”

MAKE NO MISTAKE: THERE IS NO “DEPT. OF GOVERNMENT EFFICIENCY”

It is truly appalling when TV anchors like Jake Tapper and even the NY Times, and multiple other people who should know better than to call Elon Musk’s advisory panel, playground, commision a Department. A department can Only be created and funded by Congress, starting with the State Department in 1790 and, most recently, the Department of Veterans’ Affairs established in 1987.

The “DOGE” is essentially Musk and Company with a specious label “Department” fronted by the Trump Administration and lapped up by much of the media, increasingly whitewashing Trump’s behavior, presenting a “fair and balanced” daily accounting of the Republican executive’s “novel approach to governing”. To dub something a department, when able News outlet’s the the Guardian. DO NOT BE FOOLED: This may seem a small thing, but it symbolizes something much bigger.